**The principal author submits the full paper in pdf format corresponding to the abstract which has been accepted by the Area Coordinator; **The Area Coordinator invites two registered reviewers to review the full paper; **The invited reviewers should receive automatic email messages informing that they have been invited to review that paper and that they need to enter their accounts to accept or decline the invitation. The automatic email may never reach their email boxes, in case institution policy bounces back automatic email messages. In this case, the registered reviewers need to enter their accounts every day to check whether or not they have a review invitation on their dashboards. After 3 days the Area Coordinator will cancel the invitation with no response; **Upon acceptation the reviewer will have 7 days to analyze the paper by filling an electronic form with comments in a text box and/or a pdf file attachment; **The Area Coordinator will check the review comments and make a final decision; **The authors should receive automatic email messages informing that the full paper has been reviewed. Again the automatic email may never reach their email boxes, in case institution policy bounces back automatic email messages. In this case, the authors need to enter their accounts every day to check whether or not their paper has been reviewed; **In case the final decision is "accepted with minor revisions” or “rejected unless revised”, the authors must revise their full paper according to the reviewers’ comments, upload the revised full paper file in pdf format and an extra pdf file indicating the changes and/or a rebuttal against some referee comments. This must be done maximum 10 days past the coordinator final decision; **The Area Coordinator will make a final decision as to accept or reject the revised paper based on the changes/rebuttal and on the revised paper files. **Reviewer evaluation will play a major role in the Area Coordinator decision as to whether to accept the submission for presentation. We place a great deal of trust in the referees. **We trust them to be prompt, fair, and to review the submissions carefully and in depth. At the same time, the INAC Organizers are very grateful for the time (max 7 days) and effort the reviewers invest in this review process, in which case a certificate of reviewer will be issued by ABEN.
- Create an account
- REVIEW STEPS
- Full-length paper preparation In ENGLISH
- BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF RADIATION SCIENCE SPECIAL ISSUES FOR THE ENFIR AND ENAN ACCEPTED FULL PAPERS
- Due to intensive requests, full paper submission has been extended until September 17, 2017, as a last extra opportunity for those who want to submit their work.
- POSTER TEMPLATE NOW AVAILABLE
- Preliminary Technical Programs now available on this site.